↓ Skip to main content

Impulsive and Reflective Processes Related to Alcohol Use in Young Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impulsive and Reflective Processes Related to Alcohol Use in Young Adolescents
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pieters, Sara, Burk, William J., Van der Vorst, Haske, Engels, Rutger C.M.E., Wiers, Reinout W, Engels, Rutger C., Wiers, Reinout W.

Abstract

Dual process models suggest that the development of addictive behaviors is the result of interplay between impulsive and reflective processes, modulated by boundary conditions such as individual or situational factors. Empirical support for this model has been repeatedly demonstrated in adult samples [for a meta-analysis, see Ref. (1)]. The purpose of this study was to test these processes as they relate to emerging alcohol use in adolescents. Specifically, the interactive effects of several measures of impulsive and reflective processes and working memory capacity (WMC) are examined as predictors of changes in alcohol use among adolescents. It was expected that measures of reflective processes would better predict changes in alcohol use than measures of impulsive processes. Moreover, it was anticipated that WMC would moderate the relation between alcohol-specific impulsive and reflective processes and changes in adolescent alcohol use.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Netherlands 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 23 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 35%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 62%
Social Sciences 4 15%
Unspecified 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2014.
All research outputs
#8,788,914
of 11,410,328 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#1,237
of 1,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,458
of 182,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#37
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,410,328 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.