You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Discerning the timing and cause of historical mortality events in modern Porites from the Great Barrier Reef
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.gca.2014.04.022 |
Authors |
Tara R. Clark, Jian-xin Zhao, George Roff, Yue-xing Feng, Terence J. Done, Luke D. Nothdurft, John M. Pandolfi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 19% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
Professor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 14 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 31% |
Environmental Science | 14 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Psychology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#961,336
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
#65
of 4,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,270
of 240,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
#3
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.