↓ Skip to main content

Hunting and gathering: new imperatives in mapping and collecting student learning data to assure quality outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Higher Education Research and Development, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Hunting and gathering: new imperatives in mapping and collecting student learning data to assure quality outcomes
Published in
Higher Education Research and Development, May 2014
DOI 10.1080/07294360.2014.911249
Authors

Romy Lawson, Tracy Taylor, Erica French, Eveline Fallshaw, Cathy Hall, Shelley Kinash, Jane Summers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Lecturer 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 9%
Librarian 4 7%
Other 15 28%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 35%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 17%
Engineering 4 7%
Linguistics 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 9 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,929,744
of 5,558,909 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education Research and Development
#252
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,910
of 131,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education Research and Development
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,558,909 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.