↓ Skip to main content

Avaliação da nested PCR em comparação aos testes sorológicos IDGA e ELISA para o diagnóstico da anemia infecciosa equina

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avaliação da nested PCR em comparação aos testes sorológicos IDGA e ELISA para o diagnóstico da anemia infecciosa equina
Published in
Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, April 2011
DOI 10.1590/s0102-09352011000200004
Authors

E.M. Santos, P.M.C. Motta, M.B. Heinemann, R.C. Leite, J.K.P. Reis

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2014.
All research outputs
#13,698,860
of 15,524,600 outputs
Outputs from Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
#56
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,102
of 190,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,524,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them