You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
“I eat the manofê so it is not forgotten”: local perceptions and consumption of native wild edible plants from seasonal dry forests in Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-10-45 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Margarita Paloma Cruz, Patrícia Muniz Medeiros, Iván Sarmiento-Combariza, Nivaldo Peroni, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque |
Abstract |
There is little information available on the factors influencing people's selection of wild plants for consumption. Studies suggest a suitable method of understanding the selection of edible plants is to assess people's perceptions of these resources. The use and knowledge of wild resources is disappearing, as is the opportunity to use them. This study analyzes people's perceptions of native wild edible plants in a rural Caatinga (seasonal dry forest) community in Northeast Brazil and the relationships between the use of these resources and socioeconomic factors. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 124 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 12% |
Researcher | 12 | 9% |
Other | 27 | 21% |
Unknown | 19 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 37% |
Environmental Science | 21 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Unknown | 33 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,230,558
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#658
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,960
of 226,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.