↓ Skip to main content

Abnormal tail feathers in the Common Reed Bunting and other Emberiza species in Japan, 2011/2012

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Ornithology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Abnormal tail feathers in the Common Reed Bunting and other Emberiza species in Japan, 2011/2012
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ornithology, January 2013
DOI 10.3838/jjo.62.143
Authors

Naoki TOMITA, Noboru NAKAMURA, Yasuko IWAMI, Kiyoaki OZAKI

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 222 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 <1%
Unknown 222 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Unknown 222 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2014.
All research outputs
#9,026,275
of 14,378,051 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ornithology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,144
of 189,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ornithology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,378,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them