You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimisation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV‐infected children under 3 years of age
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004772.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martina Penazzato, Andrew J. Prendergast, Lulu M Muhe, Denis Tindyebwa, Elaine Abrams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Argentina | 2 | 15% |
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 343 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 19% |
| Researcher | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 70 | 20% |
| Unknown | 80 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 9% |
| Psychology | 15 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 49 | 14% |
| Unknown | 92 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,161,838
of 25,613,746 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,527
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,961
of 240,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,613,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.