You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metabolic network reconstruction and genome-scale model of butanol-producing strain Clostridium beijerinckii NCIMB 8052
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Systems Biology, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-0509-5-130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline B Milne, James A Eddy, Ravali Raju, Soroush Ardekani, Pan-Jun Kim, Ryan S Senger, Yong-Su Jin, Hans P Blaschek, Nathan D Price |
| Abstract |
Solventogenic clostridia offer a sustainable alternative to petroleum-based production of butanol--an important chemical feedstock and potential fuel additive or replacement. C. beijerinckii is an attractive microorganism for strain design to improve butanol production because it (i) naturally produces the highest recorded butanol concentrations as a byproduct of fermentation; and (ii) can co-ferment pentose and hexose sugars (the primary products from lignocellulosic hydrolysis). Interrogating C. beijerinckii metabolism from a systems viewpoint using constraint-based modeling allows for simulation of the global effect of genetic modifications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 27% |
| Researcher | 54 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 92 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 15% |
| Engineering | 17 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2011.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#644
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,048
of 107,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#18
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.