↓ Skip to main content

Prone positioning does not affect cannula function during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or continuous renal replacement therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prone positioning does not affect cannula function during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or continuous renal replacement therapy
Published in
Critical Care, August 2002
DOI 10.1186/cc1814
Pubmed ID
Authors

Goettler, Claudia E, Pryor, John P, Hoey, Brian A, Phillips, JoAnne K, Balas, Michelle C, Shapiro, Michael B

Abstract

Prone positioning in respiratory failure has been shown to be a useful adjunct in the treatment of severe hypoxia. However, the prone position can result in dislodgment or malfunction of tubes and cannulae. Certain patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may also benefit from positional therapy. The impact of cannula-related complications in these patients is potentially disastrous. The safety and efficacy of prone positioning of these patients has not been previously reported.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 11 26%
Other 10 24%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 4 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2014.
All research outputs
#16,626,226
of 21,343,339 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,146
of 5,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,768
of 205,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#66
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,343,339 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.