↓ Skip to main content

Limits to growth: why neuroscience needs large-scale science

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Limits to growth: why neuroscience needs large-scale science
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, May 2004
DOI 10.1038/nn0504-426
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas R Insel, Nora D Volkow, Story C Landis, Ting-Kai Li, James F Battey, Paul Sieving

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 40%
Professor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 23%
Neuroscience 7 18%
Engineering 3 8%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,405,709
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#3,580
of 5,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,841
of 58,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#26
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.