↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for improving sit-to-stand ability following stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for improving sit-to-stand ability following stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007232.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Pollock, Charla Gray, Elsie Culham, Brian R Durward, Peter Langhorne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 266 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 24%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Unspecified 34 13%
Researcher 30 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Other 80 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 19%
Unspecified 44 16%
Neuroscience 13 5%
Engineering 12 4%
Other 52 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2019.
All research outputs
#937,315
of 13,515,117 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,884
of 10,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,379
of 188,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,515,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.