↓ Skip to main content

Multiple-allergen oral immunotherapy improves quality of life in caregivers of food-allergic pediatric subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
patent
14 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple-allergen oral immunotherapy improves quality of life in caregivers of food-allergic pediatric subjects
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1710-1492-10-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iris M Otani, Philippe Bégin, Clare Kearney, Tina LR Dominguez, Anjuli Mehrotra, Liane R Bacal, Shruti Wilson, Kari Nadeau

Abstract

Food allergy (FA) negatively affects quality of life in caregivers of food-allergic children, imposing a psychosocial and economic burden. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising investigational therapy for FA. However, OIT can be a source of anxiety as it carries risk for allergic reactions. The effect of OIT with multiple food allergens (mOIT) on FA-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) has never been studied in participants with multiple, severe food allergies. This study is the first to investigate the effects of mOIT on FA-related HRQL in caregivers of pediatric subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 34%
Psychology 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,822,992
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#158
of 928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,453
of 245,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.