↓ Skip to main content

Accessibility and implementation in UK services of an effective depression relapse prevention programme – mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT): ASPIRE study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accessibility and implementation in UK services of an effective depression relapse prevention programme – mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT): ASPIRE study protocol
Published in
Implementation Science, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-9-62
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo Rycroft-Malone, Rob Anderson, Rebecca S Crane, Andy Gibson, Felix Gradinger, Heledd Owen Griffiths, Stewart Mercer, Willem Kuyken, Rycroft-Malone J, Anderson R, Crane RS, Gibson A, Gradinger F, Owen Griffiths H, Mercer S, Kuyken W

Abstract

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is a cost-effective psychosocial prevention programme that helps people with recurrent depression stay well in the long term. It was singled out in the 2009 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Depression Guideline as a key priority for implementation. Despite good evidence and guideline recommendations, its roll-out and accessibility across the UK appears to be limited and inequitably distributed. The study aims to describe the current state of MBCT accessibility and implementation across the UK, develop an explanatory framework of what is hindering and facilitating its progress in different areas, and develop an Implementation Plan and related resources to promote better and more equitable availability and use of MBCT within the UK National Health Service.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 155 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Researcher 29 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Other 16 10%
Other 39 25%
Unknown 6 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 23%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 12 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,005,335
of 11,344,222 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#349
of 1,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,384
of 183,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,344,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.