You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of continuous passive motion and sling exercise training on clinical and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized active-controlled clinical study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-12-68 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anett Mau-Moeller, Martin Behrens, Susanne Finze, Sven Bruhn, Rainer Bader, Wolfram Mittelmeier |
| Abstract |
The parallel-group randomized active-controlled clinical study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of two in-hospital range of motion (ROM) exercise programs following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Continuous passive motion (CPM) is frequently used to increase ROM and improve postoperative recovery despite little conclusive scientific evidence. In contrast, a new active sling-based ROM therapy requires the activation of the knee joint muscles and dynamic joint stabilization. It was hypothesized that higher demands on muscle strength and muscle coordination during sling exercise training (ST) might be advantageous for early recovery following TKA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Singapore | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 327 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 57 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 7% |
| Researcher | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 13% |
| Unknown | 86 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 75 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 105 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,276,220
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#684
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,617
of 241,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.