↓ Skip to main content

Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000255.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Lyrer, Stefan Engelter

Abstract

Extracranial internal carotid artery dissection (eICAD) is a leading cause of stroke in younger patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 126 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 3%
Researcher 3 2%
Student > Postgraduate 3 2%
Professor 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 108 84%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Unspecified 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Unknown 108 84%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,230,383
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,246
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,312
of 188,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#154
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.