↓ Skip to main content

Geographic coincidence of richness, mass, conservation value, and response to climate of U.S. land birds

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geographic coincidence of richness, mass, conservation value, and response to climate of U.S. land birds
Published in
Ecological Applications, June 2014
DOI 10.1890/12-0823.1
Authors

Ralph Grundel, Krystalynn J. Frohnapple, David N. Zaya, Gary A. Glowacki, Chelsea J. Weiskerger, Tamatha A. Patterson, Noel B. Pavlovic

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Malaysia 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 53%
Environmental Science 9 28%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 3 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,099,892
of 14,145,010 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,543
of 2,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,289
of 189,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#18
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,145,010 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.