↓ Skip to main content

Longissimus dorsi transcriptome analysis of purebred and crossbred Iberian pigs differing in muscle characteristics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Longissimus dorsi transcriptome analysis of purebred and crossbred Iberian pigs differing in muscle characteristics
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-413
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Óvilo, Rita Benítez, Almudena Fernández, Yolanda Núñez, Miriam Ayuso, Ana Fernández, Carmen Rodríguez, Beatriz Isabel, Ana Rey, Clemente López-Bote, Luis Silió

Abstract

The two main genetic types in Iberian pig production show important phenotypic differences in growth, fattening and tissue composition since early developmental stages. The objective of this work was the evaluation of muscle transcriptome profile in piglets of both genetic types, in order to identify genes, pathways and regulatory factors responsible for their phenotypic differences. Contemporary families coming from pure Iberian pigs (IB) or from crossing with Duroc boars (DU×IB) were generated. Piglets (14 from each genetic type) were slaughtered at weaning (28 days) and longissimus dorsi was sampled for composition and gene expression studies. RNA was obtained and hybridized to Affymetrix Porcine Genechip expression arrays.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 23%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 39%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2014.
All research outputs
#10,969,413
of 12,378,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,358
of 7,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,085
of 196,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#208
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,378,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,251 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.