You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patterns across multiple memories are identified over time
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nn.3736 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Blake A Richards, Frances Xia, Adam Santoro, Jana Husse, Melanie A Woodin, Sheena A Josselyn, Paul W Frankland |
| Abstract |
Memories are not static but continue to be processed after encoding. This is thought to allow the integration of related episodes via the identification of patterns. Although this idea lies at the heart of contemporary theories of systems consolidation, it has yet to be demonstrated experimentally. Using a modified water-maze paradigm in which platforms are drawn stochastically from a spatial distribution, we found that mice were better at matching platform distributions 30 d compared to 1 d after training. Post-training time-dependent improvements in pattern matching were associated with increased sensitivity to new platforms that conflicted with the pattern. Increased sensitivity to pattern conflict was reduced by pharmacogenetic inhibition of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). These results indicate that pattern identification occurs over time, which can lead to conflicts between new information and existing knowledge that must be resolved, in part, by computations carried out in the mPFC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 18% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 68% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 511 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 484 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 141 | 28% |
| Researcher | 96 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 62 | 12% |
| Unknown | 77 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 133 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 132 | 26% |
| Psychology | 101 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 5% |
| Unknown | 95 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,053,919
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#1,679
of 5,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,946
of 241,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#15
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.