↓ Skip to main content

Estágio de prontidão de pacientes com disfonia comportamental pré e pós-terapia de voz de grupo

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estágio de prontidão de pacientes com disfonia comportamental pré e pós-terapia de voz de grupo
Published in
CoDAS, August 2017
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20172016198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bianca Oliveira Ismael da Costa, Priscila Oliveira Costa Silva, Renata Serrano de Andrade Pinheiro, Hêmmylly Farias da Silva, Anna Alice Figueirêdo de Almeida

Abstract

To verify the efficacy of group voice therapy in the stage of readiness and identify which items of the URICA-Voice range are more sensitive to post-therapy change in patients with behavioral dysphonia. An intervention study was conducted on 49 patients with behavioral dysphonia. An eclectic approach to group therapy was implemented over eight sessions, the first and last sessions consisting of assessments. The URICA-Voice range was used to evaluate the stage of readiness at pre- and post-therapy assessments. A descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was implemented for the results. Most participants were female, did not make professional use of voice, and had membranous vocal fold lesions. Most of them were in the Contemplation stage at in both moments, pre- and post-therapy. There was no significant change in the comparison of pre- and post-therapy scores. The majority of patients showed a reduction in the stage of readiness and some advanced to a higher stage. In the comparison of URICA-V range items, seven questions had equal or inferior responses in the post-therapy assessment. There was no statistical difference when comparing the pre- and post-therapy total average score of the URICA-Voice range. There were significant changes in the stage of readiness of patients in pre- and post-group speech therapy assessments.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 9 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Psychology 1 5%
Decision Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 9 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2017.
All research outputs
#9,295,766
of 11,623,235 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#70
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,126
of 264,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,623,235 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them