↓ Skip to main content

Intra-articular steroids and splints/rest for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adults with rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intra-articular steroids and splints/rest for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adults with rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002824.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret M Wallen, Donna Gillies

Abstract

Resting or immobilizing a joint to enhance outcomes following intra-articular (IA) steroid injection is generally advocated. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy of IA steroid injections and the influence of post-injection rest.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 13%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 24 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,643,859
of 15,147,785 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,257
of 11,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,948
of 190,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,147,785 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.