↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic-locking-screw (DLS)–leads to less secondary screw perforations in proximal humerus fractures

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic-locking-screw (DLS)–leads to less secondary screw perforations in proximal humerus fractures
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Freude, Steffen Schroeter, Michael Plecko, Christian Bahrs, Frank Martetschlaeger, Tobias M Kraus, Ulrich Stoeckle, Stefan Doebele

Abstract

Loss of reduction and screw perforation causes high failure rates in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the early postoperative complications using modern Dynamic Locking Screws (DLS 3.7) for plating of proximal humerus fractures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Other 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 39%
Engineering 10 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2014.
All research outputs
#17,721,395
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,890
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,773
of 228,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#66
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.