↓ Skip to main content

Psychological pain treatment in fibromyalgia syndrome: efficacy of operant behavioural and cognitive behavioural treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological pain treatment in fibromyalgia syndrome: efficacy of operant behavioural and cognitive behavioural treatments
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, July 2006
DOI 10.1186/ar2010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kati Thieme, Herta Flor, Dennis C Turk

Abstract

The present study focused on the evaluation of the effects of operant behavioural (OBT) and cognitive behavioural (CBT) treatments for fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). One hundred and twenty-five patients who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria for FMS were randomly assigned to OBT (n = 43), CBT (n = 42), or an attention-placebo (AP) treatment (n = 40) that consisted of discussions of FMS-related problems. Assessments of physical functioning, pain, affective distress, and cognitive and behavioural variables were performed pre-treatment and post-treatment as well as 6 and 12 months post-treatment. Patients receiving the OBT or CBT reported a significant reduction in pain intensity post-treatment (all Fs > 3.89, all Ps < 0.01). In addition, the CBT group reported statistically significant improvements in cognitive (all Fs > 7.95, all P < 0.01) and affective variables (all Fs > 2.99, all Ps < 0.02), and the OBT group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in physical functioning and behavioural variables (all Fs > 5.99, all Ps < 0.001) compared with AP. The AP group reported no significant improvement but actually deterioration in the outcome variables. The post-treatment effects for the OBT and CBT groups were maintained at both the 6- and 12-month follow-ups. These results suggest that both OBT and CBT are effective in treating patients with FMS with some differences in the outcome measures specifically targeted by the individual treatments compared with an unstructured discussion group. The AP group showed that unstructured discussion of FMS-related problems may be detrimental.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 192 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Student > Master 25 12%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 52 25%
Unknown 22 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 29 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,710
of 3,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,748
of 90,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.