You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The 2nd DBCLS BioHackathon: interoperable bioinformatics Web services for integrated applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Semantics, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2041-1480-2-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toshiaki Katayama, Mark D Wilkinson, Rutger Vos, Takeshi Kawashima, Shuichi Kawashima, Mitsuteru Nakao, Yasunori Yamamoto, Hong-Woo Chun, Atsuko Yamaguchi, Shin Kawano, Jan Aerts, Kiyoko F Aoki-Kinoshita, Kazuharu Arakawa, Bruno Aranda, Raoul JP Bonnal, José M Fernández, Takatomo Fujisawa, Paul MK Gordon, Naohisa Goto, Syed Haider, Todd Harris, Takashi Hatakeyama, Isaac Ho, Masumi Itoh, Arek Kasprzyk, Nobuhiro Kido, Young-Joo Kim, Akira R Kinjo, Fumikazu Konishi, Yulia Kovarskaya, Greg von Kuster, Alberto Labarga, Vachiranee Limviphuvadh, Luke McCarthy, Yasukazu Nakamura, Yunsun Nam, Kozo Nishida, Kunihiro Nishimura, Tatsuya Nishizawa, Soichi Ogishima, Tom Oinn, Shinobu Okamoto, Shujiro Okuda, Keiichiro Ono, Kazuki Oshita, Keun-Joon Park, Nicholas Putnam, Martin Senger, Jessica Severin, Yasumasa Shigemoto, Hideaki Sugawara, James Taylor, Oswaldo Trelles, Chisato Yamasaki, Riu Yamashita, Noriyuki Satoh, Toshihisa Takagi |
| Abstract |
The interaction between biological researchers and the bioinformatics tools they use is still hampered by incomplete interoperability between such tools. To ensure interoperability initiatives are effectively deployed, end-user applications need to be aware of, and support, best practices and standards. Here, we report on an initiative in which software developers and genome biologists came together to explore and raise awareness of these issues: BioHackathon 2009. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 8 | 11% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 53 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 47% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2011.
All research outputs
#4,820,810
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#68
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,426
of 130,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them