You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-3-56 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Teryl K Nuckols, Crystal Smith-Spangler, Sally C Morton, Steven M Asch, Vaspaan M Patel, Laura J Anderson, Emily L Deichsel, Paul G Shekelle |
| Abstract |
The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act subsidizes implementation by hospitals of electronic health records with computerized provider order entry (CPOE), which may reduce patient injuries caused by medication errors (preventable adverse drug events, pADEs). Effects on pADEs have not been rigorously quantified, and effects on medication errors have been variable. The objectives of this analysis were to assess the effectiveness of CPOE at reducing pADEs in hospital-related settings, and examine reasons for heterogeneous effects on medication errors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 23% |
| Ireland | 7 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Argentina | 2 | 6% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 26% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 399 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 80 | 20% |
| Researcher | 46 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 83 | 20% |
| Unknown | 88 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 39 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 30 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 55 | 13% |
| Unknown | 107 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#746,468
of 25,374,374 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#92
of 2,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,903
of 234,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.