↓ Skip to main content

A practical guide to the monitoring and management of the complications of systemic corticosteroid therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 928)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
30 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
834 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1386 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A practical guide to the monitoring and management of the complications of systemic corticosteroid therapy
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1710-1492-9-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dora Liu, Alexandra Ahmet, Leanne Ward, Preetha Krishnamoorthy, Efrem D Mandelcorn, Richard Leigh, Jacques P Brown, Albert Cohen, Harold Kim

Abstract

Systemic corticosteroids play an integral role in the management of many inflammatory and immunologic conditions, but these agents are also associated with serious risks. Osteoporosis, adrenal suppression, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, Cushing's syndrome, psychiatric disturbances and immunosuppression are among the more serious side effects noted with systemic corticosteroid therapy, particularly when used at high doses for prolonged periods. This comprehensive article reviews these adverse events and provides practical recommendations for their prevention and management based on both current literature and the clinical experience of the authors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 1378 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 198 14%
Student > Master 163 12%
Other 120 9%
Student > Postgraduate 110 8%
Researcher 104 8%
Other 260 19%
Unknown 431 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 490 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 119 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 3%
Other 145 10%
Unknown 474 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#769,747
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#37
of 928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,065
of 208,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.