You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tools for measuring patient safety in primary care settings using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Primary Care, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-15-110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian G Bell, Rachel Spencer, Anthony J Avery, Stephen M Campbell |
| Abstract |
The majority of patient contacts occur in general practice but general practice patient safety has been poorly described and under-researched to date compared to hospital settings. Our objective was to produce a set of patient safety tools and indicators that can be used in general practices in any healthcare setting and develop a 'toolkit' of feasible patient safety measures for general practices in England. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Uganda | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,276
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,933
of 242,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#22
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.