↓ Skip to main content

Are reconstructed pre‐instrumental hemispheric temperatures consistent with instrumental hemispheric temperatures?

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Are reconstructed pre‐instrumental hemispheric temperatures consistent with instrumental hemispheric temperatures?
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, June 2004
DOI 10.1029/2004gl019658
Authors

N. G. Andronova, M. E. Schlesinger, M. E. Mann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 5%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 30%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 43%
Environmental Science 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,153,178
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#5,734
of 20,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,100
of 58,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#15
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.