↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2006
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-5-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Chen, AndrewK Githeko, Guofa Zhou, JohnI Githure, Guiyun Yan

Abstract

Malaria cases on the highlands west of Mount Kenya have been noticed since 10-20 years ago. It was not clear whether these cases were introduced from the nearby lowland or resulted from local transmission because of no record of vector mosquitoes on the highlands. Determination of presence and abundance of malaria vector is vital for effective control and epidemic risk assessment of malaria among both local residents and tourists.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Senegal 1 2%
Unknown 50 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 27%
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 5 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,656,631
of 14,173,431 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#792
of 4,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,330
of 190,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,173,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them