You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Heparins and mechanical methods for thromboprophylaxis in colorectal surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001217 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peer Wille-Jørgensen, Morten Schnack Rasmussen, Betina Ristorp Andersen, Lars Borly |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 26% |
| Unknown | 32 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,444,500
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,942
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,839
of 133,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.