↓ Skip to main content

SMC complexes differentially compact mitotic chromosomes according to genomic context

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Cell Biology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SMC complexes differentially compact mitotic chromosomes according to genomic context
Published in
Nature Cell Biology, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/ncb3594
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Andrea Schalbetter, Anton Goloborodko, Geoffrey Fudenberg, Jon-Matthew Belton, Catrina Miles, Miao Yu, Job Dekker, Leonid Mirny, Jonathan Baxter

Abstract

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes are key determinants of chromosome conformation. Using Hi-C and polymer modelling, we study how cohesin and condensin, two deeply conserved SMC complexes, organize chromosomes in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The canonical role of cohesin is to co-align sister chromatids, while condensin generally compacts mitotic chromosomes. We find strikingly different roles for the two complexes in budding yeast mitosis. First, cohesin is responsible for compacting mitotic chromosome arms, independently of sister chromatid cohesion. Polymer simulations demonstrate that this role can be fully accounted for through cis-looping of chromatin. Second, condensin is generally dispensable for compaction along chromosome arms. Instead, it plays a targeted role compacting the rDNA proximal regions and promoting resolution of peri-centromeric regions. Our results argue that the conserved mechanism of SMC complexes is to form chromatin loops and that distinct SMC-dependent looping activities are selectively deployed to appropriately compact chromosomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 199 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 29%
Researcher 38 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Master 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 38 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 92 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 21%
Physics and Astronomy 11 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 39 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#866,130
of 24,041,016 outputs
Outputs from Nature Cell Biology
#494
of 3,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,689
of 320,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Cell Biology
#17
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,041,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.