You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An integrated expression atlas of miRNAs and their promoters in human and mouse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nbt.3947 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Derek de Rie, Imad Abugessaisa, Tanvir Alam, Erik Arner, Peter Arner, Haitham Ashoor, Gaby Åström, Magda Babina, Nicolas Bertin, A Maxwell Burroughs, Ailsa J Carlisle, Carsten O Daub, Michael Detmar, Ruslan Deviatiiarov, Alexandre Fort, Claudia Gebhard, Daniel Goldowitz, Sven Guhl, Thomas J Ha, Jayson Harshbarger, Akira Hasegawa, Kosuke Hashimoto, Meenhard Herlyn, Peter Heutink, Kelly J Hitchens, Chung Chau Hon, Edward Huang, Yuri Ishizu, Chieko Kai, Takeya Kasukawa, Peter Klinken, Timo Lassmann, Charles-Henri Lecellier, Weonju Lee, Marina Lizio, Vsevolod Makeev, Anthony Mathelier, Yulia A Medvedeva, Niklas Mejhert, Christopher J Mungall, Shohei Noma, Mitsuhiro Ohshima, Mariko Okada-Hatakeyama, Helena Persson, Patrizia Rizzu, Filip Roudnicky, Pål Sætrom, Hiroki Sato, Jessica Severin, Jay W Shin, Rolf K Swoboda, Hiroshi Tarui, Hiroo Toyoda, Kristoffer Vitting-Seerup, Louise Winteringham, Yoko Yamaguchi, Kayoko Yasuzawa, Misako Yoneda, Noriko Yumoto, Susan Zabierowski, Peter G Zhang, Christine A Wells, Kim M Summers, Hideya Kawaji, Albin Sandelin, Michael Rehli, Yoshihide Hayashizaki, Piero Carninci, Alistair R R Forrest, Michiel J L de Hoon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 167 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 22% |
| Australia | 13 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 7% |
| Japan | 7 | 4% |
| Germany | 6 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 2% |
| Norway | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 57 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 53% |
| Scientists | 73 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 637 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 637 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 144 | 23% |
| Researcher | 111 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 24 | 4% |
| Other | 91 | 14% |
| Unknown | 143 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 213 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 101 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 18 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 3% |
| Other | 80 | 13% |
| Unknown | 167 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#249,966
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#530
of 8,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,313
of 326,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#7
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.