↓ Skip to main content

Uso racional de medicamentos, farmaceuticalização e usos do metilfenidato

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uso racional de medicamentos, farmaceuticalização e usos do metilfenidato
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, August 2017
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232017228.08622017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Esher, Tiago Coutinho

Abstract

The rational use of medicines (URM) is considered one of the key elements recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for pharmaceutical policies. The excessive increase in the use of medicines in many countries has been identified as a major barrier to the achievement of URM and is part of a phenomenon called the 'pharmaceuticalization' of the society. This paper aims to present innitiatives to rationalize the use of methylphenidate and its limits in Brazil, considering the concept of pharmaceuticalization of the society. It is an exploratory study, based on a narrative review of the scientific literature. Controversies about the uses of methylphenidate make it a good example of this phenomenon and may help in the reflection and construction of new paths to the limits found by the concept of rational use of medicines.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 31%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 1 1%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 31 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 32 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,264,793
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#686
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,715
of 327,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.