↓ Skip to main content

Systematic searching for environmental evidence using multiple tools and sources

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 204)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
38 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic searching for environmental evidence using multiple tools and sources
Published in
Environmental Evidence, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13750-017-0099-6
Authors

Barbara Livoreil, Julie Glanville, Neal R. Haddaway, Helen Bayliss, Alison Bethel, Frédérique Flamerie de Lachapelle, Shannon Robalino, Sini Savilaakso, Wen Zhou, Gill Petrokofsky, Geoff Frampton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 25 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 26%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Engineering 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 14 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#478,819
of 15,124,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#11
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,234
of 271,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,124,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them