↓ Skip to main content

Lead Poisoning

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Medicine, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 682)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
648 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lead Poisoning
Published in
Annual Review of Medicine, February 2004
DOI 10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.103653
Pubmed ID
Authors

Herbert Needleman

Abstract

Understanding of lead toxicity has advanced substantially over the past three decades, and focus has shifted from high-dose effects in clinically symptomatic individuals to the consequences of exposure at lower doses that cause no symptoms, particularly in children and fetuses. The availability of more sensitive analytic methods has made it possible to measure lead at much lower concentrations. This advance, along with more refined epidemiological techniques and better outcome measures, has lowered the least observable effect level until it approaches zero. As a consequence, the segment of the population who are diagnosed with exposure to toxic levels has expanded. At the same time, environmental efforts, most importantly the removal of lead from gasoline, have dramatically reduced the amount of lead in the biosphere. The remaining major source of lead is older housing stock. Although the cost of lead paint abatement is measured in billions of dollars, the monetized benefits of such a Herculean task have been shown to far outweigh the costs.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 222 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 <1%
Researcher 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 218 98%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Unknown 218 98%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 144. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#101,693
of 13,565,334 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Medicine
#3
of 682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,487
of 189,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,565,334 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them