You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for early onset chronic depression: design and rationale of a multisite randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-11-134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisabeth Schramm, Martin Hautzinger, Ingo Zobel, Levente Kriston, Mathias Berger, Martin Härter |
| Abstract |
Effective treatment strategies for chronic depression are urgently needed since it is not only a common and particularly disabling disorder, but is also considered treatment resistant by most clinicians. There are only a few studies on chronic depression indicating that traditional psycho- and pharmacological interventions are not as effective as in acute, episodic depression. Current medications are no more effective than those introduced 50 years ago whereas the only psychotherapy developed specifically for the subgroup of chronic depression, the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), faired well in one large trial. However, CBASP has never been directly compared to a non-specific control treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Japan | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 14% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 86 | 46% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 49 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,876,545
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,395
of 4,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,051
of 123,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#10
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.