↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a low-fructose and/or low-sucrose diet in decreasing insulin resistance (DISFRUTE study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of a low-fructose and/or low-sucrose diet in decreasing insulin resistance (DISFRUTE study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2043-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Santiago Domínguez Coello, Lourdes Carrillo Fernández, Jesús Gobierno Hernández, Manuel Méndez Abad, Carlos Borges Álamo, José Antonio García Dopico, Armando Aguirre Jaime, Antonio Cabrera de León, the DISFRUTE Group

Abstract

Research published to date on the relationship between insulin resistance (IR) and fructose consumption is scarce, has used different methods, and has yielded sometimes contradictory results. This study aims to determine whether a low-fructose and/or low-sucrose diet supervised by a physician or nurse decreases IR compared to a standard diet. This field trial is located at primary care centers. The participants are adults aged 29 to 66 years, with a Body mass Index (BMI) between 29 and 40.99 kg/m(2) and without diabetes. To date, 245 participants have been assigned randomly to the low-fructose diet intervention group (LFDI) at health centers in the western health service zone of Tenerife island, and 245 to the standard-diet control group (SDC) at health centers in the eastern health service zone. Recruitment is opportunistic and is carried out by physicians and nurses at participating health centers. Initially (baseline), and after 24 weeks of intervention, dietary records, physical activity, waist circumference, BMI, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose and insulin concentrations (HOMA2-IR) and lipid profile are recorded; blood glucose and insulin and lipid profile are also recorded 2 h after a 75-g glucose overload. After 48 weeks (24 weeks after the intervention), fasting blood samples are again obtained and a physical examination is performed. All tests and measures are repeated and recorded except dietary records, physical activity and oral glucose overload. Low-fructose diets are designed by calculating free and total (free + fructose associated with sucrose) fructose contents in standard diets, and removing foods with a fructose content in the highest quartile for the amounts in the standard diet. Participants in both groups are prescribed a diet that contains 30 to 40% less than the participant's energy requirements. The primary endpoint is change in HOMA2-IR between baseline and week 24, and other outcomes are change in HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides , waist circumference to height ratio and BMI. The secondary endpoint is change in HOMA2-IR between week 24 and week 48 together with the outcomes noted above. Comparisons between groups for variables used to indicate IR levels are done with a Student's t test for unpaired variables or the Mann-Whitney U test if the distribution is not normal. Multivariate regression models will be used to control for confounding factors not accounted for in the study design, and for independent prognostic factors. If the dietary intervention being tested, i.e., a diet low in fructose/sucrose, is able to reduce IR, the results - if translated into regular clinical practice - could provide a hitherto unavailable tool to prevent type-2 diabetes mellitus. ISRCTN, ID: ISRCTN41579277 . Registered retrospectively on 15 November 2016.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 175 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 18%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 5 3%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 69 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 17%
Sports and Recreations 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 71 41%