You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.3008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeremy Schmutz, Phillip E McClean, Sujan Mamidi, G Albert Wu, Steven B Cannon, Jane Grimwood, Jerry Jenkins, Shengqiang Shu, Qijian Song, Carolina Chavarro, Mirayda Torres-Torres, Valerie Geffroy, Samira Mafi Moghaddam, Dongying Gao, Brian Abernathy, Kerrie Barry, Matthew Blair, Mark A Brick, Mansi Chovatia, Paul Gepts, David M Goodstein, Michael Gonzales, Uffe Hellsten, David L Hyten, Gaofeng Jia, James D Kelly, Dave Kudrna, Rian Lee, Manon M S Richard, Phillip N Miklas, Juan M Osorno, Josiane Rodrigues, Vincent Thareau, Carlos A Urrea, Mei Wang, Yeisoo Yu, Ming Zhang, Rod A Wing, Perry B Cregan, Daniel S Rokhsar, Scott A Jackson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 28% |
| Mexico | 5 | 13% |
| Belgium | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 18 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 18 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 927 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 1% |
| Brazil | 10 | 1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 2% |
| Unknown | 873 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 184 | 20% |
| Researcher | 167 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 134 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 78 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 70 | 8% |
| Other | 119 | 13% |
| Unknown | 175 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 541 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 125 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 40 | 4% |
| Unknown | 191 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#459,559
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#925
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,911
of 247,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#12
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.