You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Isolation of c-Kit+ Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells from Second Trimester
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 16 |
Book title |
Stem Cell Niche
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-508-8_16 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-507-1, 978-1-62703-508-8
|
Authors |
Michela Pozzobon, Martina Piccoli, Andrea Alex Schiavo, Anthony Atala, Paolo De Coppi |
Abstract |
Amniotic fluid-derived stem (AFS) cells have been described as an appealing source of stem cells because of their (1) fetal, non-embryonic origin, (2) easy access during pregnancy overcoming the ethical issues related both to the use of human embryonic cells and to the postnatal tissue biopsy with donor site morbidity, and (3) their undemanding ability to be expanded. We and others have demonstrated the broad differentiation potential and here we describe the established protocol we developed to obtain c-Kit+ human AFS cells, starting from second trimester amniocentesis samples. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 29% |
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 11% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2013.
All research outputs
#18,347,414
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,857
of 13,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,062
of 280,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#220
of 341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,084 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.