You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colin Hill, Francisco Guarner, Gregor Reid, Glenn R. Gibson, Daniel J. Merenstein, Bruno Pot, Lorenzo Morelli, Roberto Berni Canani, Harry J. Flint, Seppo Salminen, Philip C. Calder, Mary Ellen Sanders |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 196 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 26 | 13% |
| United States | 21 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 9% |
| Mexico | 9 | 5% |
| France | 9 | 5% |
| Canada | 9 | 5% |
| India | 5 | 3% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 72 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 116 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 41 | 21% |
| Scientists | 35 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5,536 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 5511 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 750 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 712 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 563 | 10% |
| Researcher | 470 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 270 | 5% |
| Other | 764 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2007 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 843 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 612 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 512 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 293 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 248 | 4% |
| Other | 786 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2242 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 856. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#21,338
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#2
of 2,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118
of 246,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.