You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intrapartum antibiotics for known maternal Group B streptococcal colonization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007467.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arne Ohlsson, Vibhuti S Shah |
| Abstract |
Maternal colonization with group B streptococcus (GBS) during pregnancy increases the risk of neonatal infection by vertical transmission. Administration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) during labor has been associated with a reduction in early onset GBS disease (EOGBSD). However, treating all colonized women during labor exposes a large number of women and infants to possible adverse effects without benefit. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 23 | 21% |
| United States | 20 | 18% |
| Spain | 15 | 13% |
| Canada | 7 | 6% |
| Australia | 5 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 84 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 18% |
| Scientists | 8 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 471 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 462 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 10% |
| Researcher | 43 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 105 | 22% |
| Unknown | 122 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 160 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 24 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 59 | 13% |
| Unknown | 139 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 216. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#179,607
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#309
of 13,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,398
of 244,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.