You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Outcomes with β-Blockers for Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Medicine, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sripal Bangalore, Harikrishna Makani, Martha Radford, Kamia Thakur, Bora Toklu, Stuart D. Katz, James J. DiNicolantonio, P.J. Devereaux, Karen P. Alexander, Jorn Wetterslev, Franz H. Messerli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 21% |
| Spain | 21 | 19% |
| Canada | 7 | 6% |
| Colombia | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 46 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 71 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 23% |
| Scientists | 13 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 199 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 15% |
| Researcher | 28 | 13% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 25% |
| Unknown | 37 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 59% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 45 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 161. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#259,784
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medicine
#123
of 7,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,021
of 244,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medicine
#1
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.