↓ Skip to main content

Introducing an osteopathic approach into neonatology ward: the NE-O model

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Introducing an osteopathic approach into neonatology ward: the NE-O model
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/2045-709x-22-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Cerritelli, Marta Martelli, Cinzia Renzetti, Gianfranco Pizzolorusso, Vincenzo Cozzolino, Gina Barlafante

Abstract

Several studies showed the effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment on neonatal care in reducing length of stay in hospital, gastrointestinal problems, clubfoot complications and improving cranial asymmetry of infants affected by plagiocephaly. Despite several results obtained, there is still a lack of standardized osteopathic evaluation and treatment procedures for newborns recovered in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The aim of this paper is to suggest a protocol on osteopathic approach (NE-O model) in treating hospitalized newborns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 19%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 33 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 39 32%