You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Debriefing for technology‐enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Education, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/medu.12432 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam Cheng, Walter Eppich, Vincent Grant, Jonathan Sherbino, Benjamin Zendejas, David A Cook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 10 | 29% |
| United States | 5 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 26% |
| Scientists | 6 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 464 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 454 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 10% |
| Other | 46 | 10% |
| Researcher | 46 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 134 | 29% |
| Unknown | 89 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 183 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 72 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 6% |
| Psychology | 19 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 42 | 9% |
| Unknown | 113 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,581,028
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Medical Education
#196
of 3,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,234
of 247,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Education
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.