You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Safety and effectiveness of antiretroviral therapies for HIV-infected women and their infants and children: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-3-51 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrea C Tricco, Jesmin Antony, Veroniki A Angeliki, Huda Ashoor, Brian Hutton, Brenda R Hemmelgarn, David Moher, Yaron Finkelstein, Kevin Gough, Sharon E Straus |
Abstract |
Antiretroviral therapy reduces mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) during pregnancy, delivery, and breastfeeding. However, these agents have been associated with preterm birth, anemia and low birth weight. We aim to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of the use of antiretroviral drugs among HIV-infected women and the effects on their infants and children through a systematic review and network meta-analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Canada | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 143 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
Researcher | 19 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
Other | 20 | 14% |
Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
Other | 19 | 13% |
Unknown | 40 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,134,495
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,493
of 1,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,278
of 226,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#20
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.