↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
47 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
372 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003216.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gero Langer, Astrid Fink

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Peru 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Panama 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 355 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 82 22%
Student > Bachelor 67 18%
Researcher 42 11%
Unspecified 38 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 9%
Other 107 29%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 174 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 83 22%
Unspecified 52 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 5%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#426,607
of 13,555,081 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,268
of 10,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,139
of 188,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,555,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.