You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutritional interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003216.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gero Langer, Astrid Fink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 12 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 22% |
| Scientists | 4 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 559 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 550 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 93 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 91 | 16% |
| Researcher | 53 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 7% |
| Other | 102 | 18% |
| Unknown | 140 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 171 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 145 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Psychology | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 51 | 9% |
| Unknown | 151 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#857,801
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,649
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,953
of 244,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.