You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tailored interventions based on sputum eosinophils versus clinical symptoms for asthma in children and adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005603.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Helen L Petsky, Albert Li, Anne B Chang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 20% |
Spain | 2 | 8% |
United States | 2 | 8% |
Argentina | 1 | 4% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 16% |
Scientists | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 254 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 10% |
Student > Master | 25 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
Other | 22 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
Other | 47 | 18% |
Unknown | 92 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 30 | 12% |
Unknown | 100 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,869,769
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,006
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,647
of 325,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.