↓ Skip to main content

Tailored interventions based on sputum eosinophils versus clinical symptoms for asthma in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tailored interventions based on sputum eosinophils versus clinical symptoms for asthma in children and adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005603.pub3
Authors

Helen L Petsky, Albert Li, Anne B Chang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 14%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 30 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,010,783
of 15,053,230 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,918
of 11,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,309
of 271,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,053,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.