You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Acceptability of self-collection sampling for HPV-DNA testing in low-resource settings: a mixed methods approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-596 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pooja Bansil, Scott Wittet, Jeanette L Lim, Jennifer L Winkler, Proma Paul, Jose Jeronimo |
Abstract |
Vaginal self-sampling with HPV-DNA tests is a promising primary screening method for cervical cancer. However, women's experiences, concerns and the acceptability of such tests in low-resource settings remain unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 50% |
Japan | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 187 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
Researcher | 24 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
Other | 14 | 7% |
Other | 37 | 20% |
Unknown | 45 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Other | 25 | 13% |
Unknown | 57 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,444,500
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,866
of 14,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,659
of 228,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#148
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.