You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An Evaluation of Marine Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas in the Context of Spatial Conservation Prioritization
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Letters, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1111/conl.12399 |
Authors |
Jennifer McGowan, Robert J. Smith, Moreno Di Marco, Rohan H. Clarke, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 9 | 16% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 12% |
South Africa | 2 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Somalia | 1 | 2% |
Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 29 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 37 | 65% |
Scientists | 20 | 35% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 24% |
Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 16 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 32 | 41% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 28% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Engineering | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,201,801
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#404
of 1,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,712
of 325,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.