↓ Skip to main content

Amazon Basin forest pyrogenic carbon stocks: First estimate of deep storage

Overview of attention for article published in Geoderma, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amazon Basin forest pyrogenic carbon stocks: First estimate of deep storage
Published in
Geoderma, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.029
Authors

Nina Koele, Michael Bird, Jordahna Haig, Ben Hur Marimon-Junior, Beatriz Schwantes Marimon, Oliver L. Phillips, Edmar A. de Oliveira, C.A. Quesada, Ted R. Feldpausch

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 9%
Engineering 5 8%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,574,918
of 12,368,793 outputs
Outputs from Geoderma
#483
of 901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,429
of 267,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoderma
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,368,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 901 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.