↓ Skip to main content

Amazon Basin forest pyrogenic carbon stocks: First estimate of deep storage

Overview of attention for article published in Geoderma, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amazon Basin forest pyrogenic carbon stocks: First estimate of deep storage
Published in
Geoderma, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.029
Authors

Nina Koele, Michael Bird, Jordahna Haig, Ben Hur Marimon-Junior, Beatriz Schwantes Marimon, Oliver L. Phillips, Edmar A. de Oliveira, C.A. Quesada, Ted R. Feldpausch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 8%
Engineering 6 6%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 30 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,918,049
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Geoderma
#1,716
of 2,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,461
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoderma
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,912 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.