You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biological Disputation against Tamplin's Hot Particle Proporsal for Reduction of Pu Permissible Dose
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of Japan, January 1975
|
| DOI | 10.3327/jaesj.17.154 |
| Authors |
Osamu MATSUOKA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of Japan
#36
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,938
of 20,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of Japan
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.